Dlančnik (PDA)

Poglejte polno različico : Sloznost religije & znanosti - Pantelizem


paradox
13.03.2007, 21:13
V nasem slovarju je *pantelizem* razlozen kot (filozofski/psiholoski) idealisticni nauk o volji kot osnovni f.unkciji dusevnega zivljenja (npr. pri Schopenhauerju).

Link, ki ga podajam med drugim razlozi razliko oz. pozitivnost pantelizma v primerjavi z ostalimi vecjimi religijami...

...zanimivo bi bilo slisati kaj menijo, predvsem verniki drugih vecjih svetovnih religij, o tej alternativi 'verovanja/verjetja', ki ne potrebuje sistema 'nagrajevanja/kazni' v svojih osnovnih trditvah...

http://members.aol.com/heraklit1/basicpri.htm#empiricism

shem_me_zion
18.03.2007, 08:07
Brez, da bi se spuscali v smisel verovnaja kot zelje po ne vedeti, je ocitno iz predstavitve same, da gre za
"vero" ki nima jajc, da bi bila vera. Gre za se eno od nestetih verskih skupnosti, ki se sramujejo verovanja in hkrati vstrajajo pri tem - plus nov marketing racionala - 'verjetja'.

Dajte se ze enkrat spraviti nazaj k ocetnjavi Cerkve ali pa si dajte pamet v glavo.

paradox
22.03.2007, 18:08
Brez, da bi se spuscali v smisel verovnaja kot zelje po ne vedeti, je ocitno iz predstavitve same, da gre za
"vero" ki nima jajc, da bi bila vera. Gre za se eno od nestetih verskih skupnosti, ki se sramujejo verovanja in hkrati vstrajajo pri tem - plus nov marketing racionala - 'verjetja'.
ok, ok, i can't disagree with what you're saying. However, if i needed to 'belive' in anything except the rationallity (or ocassional irrationallity:P :D ) of my brain-mind procesess i would rather chose something like pantelizem than any other major religion's dogma that i'm aware of.
As I concluded from reading this link, their main idea being respect for nature which is awesome, and do feels us with inspiration and unlimited imagination. Which is by many people , as one can see, satisfied by major religions. I find their preachings rather 'revolting' with their attempt to play on persons fears of their mortality to support their own existence. Wheres, this alternative is much closer to rational thought, though still not pure materialistic approach to life as supported by scientific method. That's why i find this alternative in believing in nature much more understandable to me considering myself non-believer. (By posting this link i mainly wanted to see, as i specified in initial post what would be response of believers in major religions like, Christianity, Islam, Budizem, etc.)

For instance...this excerpt from the given link shows a bit what mean...
-----------------------------
There is a resonance between the form of the physical universe, or of nature, and our aesthetic faculties. That resonance is based the unity of self and world. We are made of the same stuff as the cosmos, on the same patterns as the rest of nature.

Musical harmonies are relationships of simple numbers. We enjoy them because the atoms, nuclei and electrons we are made of are related by simple numbers.

We respond to natural forms because we are part of nature. We respond to physical and cosmic forms like those on these pages because we are part of the material universe.

Aesthetics is the sensory and intellectual response to the divinity of Being. Religion is the emotional and ethical response. Science is the cognitive and manipulative response.

Human art can never rival the fantastic images we find in nature, or those we see on the cosmic or the microcosmic scale through telescopes or microscopes.

....


Dajte se ze enkrat spraviti nazaj k ocetnjavi Cerkve...
...i strongly disagree :mad: :D